9.2
Trends in the field of quality assurance of urban flow and dispersion models

- Indicates paper has been withdrawn from meeting
- Indicates an Award Winner
Thursday, 6 February 2014: 12:00 AM
Room C212 (The Georgia World Congress Center )
Frank Harms, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany; and B. Leitl, M. Schatzmann, and D. Hertwig

Caused by synoptic changes and the diurnal cycle the atmospheric boundary layer is never steady-state. The unsteadiness is especially pronounced within and above the urban canopy layer. In former times it was not possible to take the natural variability of the urban atmosphere properly into account, due to a lack of both computer power for models of adequate sophistication and sufficiently matured measurement techniques. Instead of this, quasi-steady situations were assumed, despite the fact that in reality they do not exist. The situation has improved now. After a brief description of the numerical tools which are presently available, their potential to simulate urban flow and dispersion episodes is assessed. The importance of validating these tools is stressed and the question of how to obtain reliable validation data is discussed. It is recommended using combinations of field and laboratory data for the validation procedure. Finally, at the concrete example of puff dispersion within the urban canopy layer it is demonstrated how such data sets can be generated and actually applied.