Like existing CIP/FIP products, the method for computing FZRA Potential will depend on the “scenario,” or the meteorological and microphysical processes dominant in a given environment. The names of these scenarios, a description of each, and the methods for computing FZRA Potential are outlined in Table 1. This presentation will provide more details on the algorithm, a comparison to in situ aircraft observations, and maps of the gridded product.
Table 1: Names of FZRA Potential scenarios, their physical meaning, and the ingredients used to compute FZRA Potential.
Scenario Name | Physical Meaning | FZRA Potential Ingredients |
Convection | Deep, moist convection | Model temperature, model vertical wind |
Below Warm Nose | Snow/ice falls through an above-freezing layer, melts into rain, then falls into a below-freezing layer | Model temperature, model precipitable condensate, radar reflectivity (CIP only) |
Recirculation | Snow/ice falls into above-freezing layer, melts into rain, and is then lifted back up to sub-freezing temperatures through updrafts | Model temperature, model vertical wind, model liquid condensate, model rain water content, radar reflectivity (CIP only) |
Collision Coalescence | Growth of liquid droplets through collision-coalescence processes |
Model temperature; cloud top temperature and depth below cloud top (cloud top inferred from satellite for CIP and from the model for FIP); cloud reflectivity at 0.64, 1.6, and 2.2 μm from satellite (CIP only); surface precipitation reports (CIP only) |
This research is in response to requirements and funding by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official policy or position of the FAA.

