Airborne radars provide a unique opportunity to understand high-impact weather events, such as hurricanes and mesoscale convective systems, due to their ability to sample large areas of a storm and to follow a storm as it propagates. Previous experiments with the AOS output investigated some of the radar's technical limitations related to flight and scan strategies, expected beam broadening away from the radar boresight, and attenuation comparisons with X-band radars (currently in use on the NOAA WP-3D aircraft). Evaluation of the Doppler winds and their comparison with known storm characteristics confirmed that APAR could provide this information with a high level of accuracy. These experiments show that at a minimum, APAR can support objectives that were designed for mechanically scanning tail Doppler radars. APAR is also equipped with dual-polarimetric capabilities, providing a new opportunity to study the microphysical and precipitation characteristics of these severe storms in new ways.
This presented work discusses the results of several experiments investigating topics related to particle identification (PID) distributions and Quantitative Precipitation Estimates (QPE). The initial PID determination and analysis results suggest that the hydrometeor classifications generally match well between the simulated cases and known distributions. For instance, the rain and snow distributions are well-represented, but there is a noticeable difference in the amount of ice crystals depicted in the simulated storms compared to observations. The information obtained from the PID classifications is used to help determine ice water content (IWC) and ice water path (IWP) in a hurricane case. The results from the QPE analysis indicate that specific methods are preferable for APAR, where “hybrid” rain rate determination schemes tend to provide more accurate results. Additionally, results associated with the hydrometeor classification scheme are discussed for application to APAR and how they can be utilized to provide more specific estimates of particle fall speeds and ultimately generate improved estimates of vertical velocity. More appropriate vertical velocity determination has implications for the trustworthiness of 3-D wind analyses and associated microphysical processes.

