In our presentation, we start by outlining the formal difference between the growth mechanisms in both cases. From those, we formulate the update rules for two Cellular Automata - A2A (attachment to any) and A2K (attachment to kink) to investigate the above-mentioned differences between the resulting structures, with the crystallization case expanding on the aggregation one by adding the “attachment to kink (A2K) position” rule.
A pivotal aspect of our exploration involves the correlation between the symmetry observed in the final structures and, specifically, the replication of the underlying lattice symmetry with another notable parameter - the relative fraction of atoms with a given coordination number and the implicit existence of the “attachment to kink” rule in the aggregation case.

