Handout (1.8 MB)
This study picks up on the previous theoretical research on ECAPE by pursuing a logical next step, assessing the operational utility of ECAPE in severe supercell thunderstorm forecasting. Using a large dataset of nontornadic and tornadic supercell thunderstorms curated by the NOAA/NWS Storm Prediction Center, we will compare the forecast skill of undiluted CAPE versus ECAPE individually and as a component of the significant tornado parameter (STP). In particular, these comparisons will focus on fringe and marginal storm environments, such as high shear-low CAPE (HSLC), which is a part of the parameter space that has particularly low forecast skill and a higher incidence of false alarms and missed events. Results thus far indicate that the use of ECAPE in the STP yields a small improvement in discriminating between nontornadic and tornadic supercells across the whole dataset, with most of the gains occurring in fringe environments as hypothesized. In HSLC regimes, the maximum vertical velocity when accounting for entrainment can sometimes exceed the undiluted CAPE. This somewhat counterintuitive result might explain a HSLC storm’s ability to produce severe weather in what could otherwise be considered unfavorable conditions. In total, the use of ECAPE has the potential to be a fruitful real-time forecasting tool but requires further scrutiny before transitioning from research to operations.

