To make use of the ATMS science data in time series studies, the first step is to identify the inter-sensor observational bias among three ATMS sensors. Even though the design parameters are identical for all ATMS sensors, the observations obtained from different ATMS are different due to various causes, such as hardware build difference, operating temperature difference, and so on. It is important to characterize the science data systematic bias before applying the ATMS radiance data in time series research because of the high sensitivity of the climate change scale. Several ATMS science data quality evaluation and long-term inter-sensor bias analysis utilities have been developed in ATMS SDR and JPSS Integrated Cal/Val System Long-Term Monitoring (ICVS-LTM) teams to monitor the science data quality for all three on-orbit ATMS sensors. This study mainly focusses on the NOAA-21 ATMS inter-sensor bias feature after one-year operations against NOAA-20 and S-NPP. The inter comparison of different evaluation methods also help ATMS Cal/Val team to improve the accuracy of some data quality evaluation tools, such as the use of measured spectral response function (SRF) and boxcar in radiative transfer model simulation evaluations.

