This study uses the Met Office’s Unified Model to simulate smoke episodes in the Southeast Atlantic to better understand how radiative effects are sensitive to simulation and calculation methods. We compare simulated BBA radiative effects from nudged, free-running, and simulations run as weather forecasts, where meteorology is reset at regular intervals to archived analyses produced with data assimilation. We find that radiative effects depend strongly on how the meteorology is forced, and their comparison offers insight into the strengths and shortcomings of each method. We explore the sensitivity to our calculation method by using various radiation scheme outputs to separate and quantify each individual radiative effect multiple ways. Simulation accuracy is validated through comparison to various satellite retrievals and the ORACLES, CLARIFY, and LASIC field campaigns. The major properties that impact radiative effects are smoke transport, smoke optical properties, and cloud optical properties. Model biases found in these properties are addressed to the extent possible, to ensure our derived RE values are accurate. Note this presentation will update and supersede a talk on the same topic at AMS 2023 in the aerosol-climate session, with substantially revised and more comprehensive results.
- Indicates paper has been withdrawn from meeting
- Indicates an Award Winner