We have evidence that the ATAL is mainly driven by upper-level secondary formation of aerosol containing ammonium nitrate, sulfate, and organic matter [3-5]. In contrast, the vertical transport of aerosol ingested into the convection from the Asian boundary layer, including black carbon and mineral dust, plays an exceedingly minor role for the presence of the ATAL [3, 6, 7]. We frequently observed new particle formation above the cloud convective tops and subsequent growth of these particles as they were being slowly lifted within the anticyclonic motion [8-12]. The availability of precursor gases that are relevant for particle formation can partly be explained by the vertical uplift of ammonia from agricultural emissions in South Asia and anthropogenic emission of SO2 as well as NOX from lightning [4]. Along with this, observations during ACCLIP demonstrate the significance of East Asian summer monsoon convection as an effective transport pathway of precursors from East Asia to the upper troposphere [13]. We have evidence that the ATAL composition, in terms of ammonium, sulfate, and organic matter, shows variability along with the origin of precursor gases in South and East Asia [14,15]. During PHILEAS, we studied the long-distance transport and the fate of the specific aerosol originating from the ATAL. We found the Asian monsoon as an important source for ammonium nitrate and organic matter in the extratropical lower stratosphere (up to 400 K and 70 °N) in boreal summer and autumn [16]. Taken together, the ASM-influenced air affects aerosol number, size, and composition as well as aerosol acidity in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere across the Northern hemisphere. With this knowledge, we should consider effects on aerosol radiative forcing, heterogenous chemistry, and ozone depletion.
[1] J.-P. Vernier, L. W. Thomason, and J. Kar, Geophysical research letter, 38(7), (2011).
[2] S. B. Honomichl and L. L. Pan, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 125(13), (2020).
[3] O. Appel, F. Köllner, A. Dragoneas, et al., Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22(20), 13607-13630, (2022).
[4] M. Höpfner, J. Ungermann, S. Borrmann, et al., Nat. Geosci., 12, 608-612, (2019).
[5] D. Murphy and G. Schill: Measurements with PALMS-NG onboard the WB-57 during ACCLIP.
[6] M. Ebert, R. Weigel, S. Weinbruch, et al., Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 4771-4788, (2024).
[7] J. Schwarz: Measurements with SP2 onboard the WB-57 and the GV-HIAPER during ACCLIP.
[8] R. Weigel, C. Mahnke, M. Baumgartner, et al., Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 11689-11722, (2021).
[9] C. Mahnke, R. Weigel, F. Cairo, et al., Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 15259-15282, (2021).
[10] C. Williamson and C. Brock: Measurements with NMASS onboard the GV-HIAPER during ACCLIP.
[11] L. Ziemba and M. Brown: Measurements with PUTLS onboard the WB-57 during ACCLIP.
[12] M. Fujiwara: Ground-based lidar measurements from Fukuoka (Japan) during ACCLIP.
[13] L. L. Pan, E. Atlas, S. B. Honomichl, et al., P. Natl. Acad. Sci., 121 (12), (2024).
[14] O. Eppers, P. Brauner, F. Köllner, et al.: Measurements with ERICA onboard the GV-HIAPER during ACCLIP.
[15] W. Smith, R. Ueyama, and S. Honomichl: Trajectory-derived Convective Influence for ACCLIP Airborne In Situ Observations. Version 1.1. UCAR/NCAR - Earth Observing Laboratory. https://doi.org/10.26023/DP1P-C32K-YJ05, (2023).
[16] F. Köllner, F. Ekinci, O. Eppers, S. Johansson, J. Ungermann, M. Höpfner, et al.: Measurements with ERICA and GLORIA onboard the HALO during PHILEAS.
- Indicates paper has been withdrawn from meeting
- Indicates an Award Winner