Handout (5.1 MB)
TempestExtremes identifies ETCs based on sea level pressure anomalies, while the Hodges tracker is based on maximum relative vorticity. The use of these two different methodologies offers a comprehensive approach to understanding ETC characteristics, but it also introduces uncertainty in the model statistics due to potential discrepancies between the tacking algorithms. These differences highlight the importance of understanding the biases inherent in each tracking method, as they can significantly influence the interpretation of the results.
Preliminary analysis suggests a systematic poleward shift in the density and intensity of ETC tracks under global warming when using both tracking algorithms, in line with previous studies. However, this shift could be influenced by specific model configuration like the constant sea ice concentration in AM4, which may affect the accuracy of the tracking results. Further investigation is required to evaluate the robustness of the poleward shift of storm track, and to better understand the possible mechanisms of these ETC changes in a warming climate.
- Indicates paper has been withdrawn from meeting
- Indicates an Award Winner