In this study, we focused on evaluating commercial RO data from Spire. We compared the Spire observations to data from COSMIC-2, high-quality radiosonde data, and model data from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) atmospheric reanalysis version 5 (ERA5). We compared the STAR-processed Spire products with those from UCAR to evaluate the differences in the processing algorithm implementations. The results demonstrate that although Spire has a lower Signal-Noise-Ratio (SNR) in general, the pattern of the lowest penetration height for Spire is similar to that for COSMIC-2. Spire and COSMIC-2 penetration heights are between 0.6 and 0.8 km in tropical ocean regions. Although using different GNSS RO receivers, the precision of Spire profiles is of the same quality as those of COSMIC-2. The retrieval accuracy from Spire is also very compatible with those from COSMIC-2. We estimated the error covariance matrix for Spire, COSMIC-2, and KOMPSAT-5. Results indicate that the COSMIC-2 estimated error covariance values are slightly more significant over the oceans in the mid-latitudes (45oN-30oN and 30oS-45oS), which may be due to COSMIC-2’s SNR being lower in those latitudinal zones.
The manuscript contents are solely the opinions of the authors and do not constitute a statement of policy, decision, or position on behalf of NOAA or the U.S. government.
- Indicates paper has been withdrawn from meeting
- Indicates an Award Winner