Squall line ECAPE is generally larger than that of ECAPE for isolated updrafts because the former nominally entrains environmental air from two directions whereas the later entrains from all sides. This suggests that the dilution from entrainment on squall lines in a given atmospheric environment is smaller than that for isolated deep convective updrafts, a supposition that is confirmed via an analysis of large eddy simulations. An evaluation of a suite of large eddy simulations of squall lines shows impressive correspondence between the squall line ECAPE predicted maximum updraft vertical velocities, and those directly measured from the simulations. A generalized amendment to the previous ECAPE formula is proposed that accounts for the aforementioned differences in entrainment between squall lines and isolated convection.
- Indicates paper has been withdrawn from meeting
- Indicates an Award Winner