The International Civil Aviation Organization requires automated turbulence reports from aircraft in flight be in the metric of Eddy (or “Energy”) Dissipation Rate (EDR). Thousands of commercial aircraft from almost 2 dozen airlines report EDR worldwide. There are multiple ways of calculating EDR using aircraft-based sensor data, and each method has strengths and weaknesses depending on user needs. Importantly, the airline industry is eager for the development of a way to standardize performance of EDR calculations, so that data from the different methods will result in the same operational decisions by flight crews.
In response, SG4/SG2 developed RTCA document DO-370, Guidelines for In Situ EDR Algorithm Performance to set requirements for EDR algorithm developers to follow and ensure that their algorithm output was “comparable” to that of other algorithms. At the time of DO-370 development in 2017, there were three major algorithms, and the formulation of performance recommendations was conducted by the developers. DO-370 details procedures to assess algorithm performance in a simulation test environment. While the simulation approach allows for a controlled and repeatable test environment, it does not ensure the algorithms perform that way in a real-world situation.
In the 8 years since DO-370 was published, some airlines have begun using emerging, alternative methods of calculating or inferring EDR. Some of these new methods, such as accelerometer-based tablet applications and EDR data calculated using Automated Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) output, cannot be evaluated under the current DO-370 guidelines. With the help of the National Center for Atmospheric Research and The MITRE Corporation, SG4/SG2 has developed an updated methodology for validating that an EDR algorithm performs within an acceptable range of error tolerances. The expectation is that this methodology will be formalized in regulatory documents by both RTCA and EUROCAE. This presentation will provide a review of the methodology and progress to date.
- Indicates paper has been withdrawn from meeting
- Indicates an Award Winner