Empirical methods exist for classifying Rayleigh scatterings regimes by implementing thresholds for reflectivity, cross-correlation coefficient, signal to noise ratio, and standard deviation of differential phase. Simply put, if the values of the polarimetric measurements meet the criteria of these thresholds for a given range gate, that gate would be classified as a Rayleigh regime gate. However, while the process is useful for exhibiting the utility of Rayleigh scattering regimes for the purpose of isolating differential propagation phase, it is not perfect because measurements contain statistical errors. The variability in radial profiles of polarimetric products is often such that this process will exclude gates that would have otherwise been manually classified or leads to false positives in noisy, non-Rayleigh scattering regions.
We therefore believe it is imperative to study more robust statistical methods for the classification of Rayleigh and non-Rayleigh scattering regimes. In this study we will examine and compare a few different methods of this this classification. A manual classification has been performed by utilizing the available polarimetric data with our understanding of physical meteorological processes and scattering theory. This will be used as our 'ground truth.' We then utilize joint probability density functions of Rayleigh and non-Rayleigh scatters to employ a Bayesian classification at every gate. Further, we will also investigate machine learning approaches to improve the classification as these approaches can make use of not only the information at given gate but also correlations among different radar variables and that among adjacent gates. By improving the classification of Rayleigh and non-Rayleigh scattering regimes, we expect to improve our estimations of specific differential phase which, in turn, leads to improved QPE and microphysics retrievals as well as improving our estimates of differential scattering phase which should improve the detection of hail and tornado debris.
- Indicates paper has been withdrawn from meeting
- Indicates an Award Winner