The AIWP track forecast errors and detection rates are comparable to those from the best-performing operational forecast models. However, the AIWP intensity forecast errors are larger than those of even the simplest intensity forecasts based on climatology and persistence. The AIWP models almost always reduce the TC intensity, especially within the first 24 hours of the forecast, resulting in a substantial low bias.
The contribution of the AIWP models to the NHC model consensus was also evaluated. The consensus track errors are reduced by up to 11% at the longer time periods. Despite substantial negative intensity biases, the AIWP models have a neutral impact on the intensity consensus. These results show that the current formulation of the AIWP models have promise for operational TC track forecasts, but improved bias corrections or model reformulations will be needed for accurate intensity forecasts.
The results from the AIWP verifications will be presented. Further examination of AIWP models, including diagnostics of tropical cyclone structure and large-scale environment, will also be shown to provide insight into the basic verification results.
- Indicates paper has been withdrawn from meeting
- Indicates an Award Winner