Monday, 4 June 2001
The differences between upper tropospheric cyclones and anticyclones are investigated regarding the height of the thermal and the dynamical
tropopause. The problem is addressed in an idealized framework by analyzing
axisymmetric balanced flows which are characterized by
a radial scale $\Delta R$ and a tropopause potential temperature
anomaly $\Delta \theta$.
Cyclones and anticyclones are treated equivalently except for their sign of $\Delta \theta$.
The height of the thermal tropopause significantly differs from the height of the
dynamical tropopause unless the anomaly is shallow. This behaviour can be
explained by noting that the partitioning of a given PV anomaly into a thermal
and a dynamical anomaly depends on the aspect ratio of the anomaly.
There is a pronounced cyclone-anticyclone
asymmetry in that the differences between the two
tropopauses are much larger and more likely to occur
in the case of cyclones. Two factors contribute to this
asymmetry. First, for a given amplitude $|\Delta \theta|$, cyclones and
anticyclones have different aspect ratios in geometric space;
second, for a high latitude winter scenario the
critical lapse rate of the WMO thermal tropopause is asymmetric with
respect to typical tropospheric and stratospheric lapse rates.
Simulated station statistics for the height of the two tropopauses
share essential qualitative features with similar statistics from
observations.
The asymmetry in the model sensitively depends on
the lower stratospheric lapse rate. Multiple tropopauses may
greatly enhance the asymmetry.
- Indicates paper has been withdrawn from meeting
- Indicates an Award Winner