The skill of the LIM (with 37 degrees of freedom) at forecasting week 2 anomalies is competitive with that of the nonlinear medium-range forecast (MRF) model with (10^6) degrees of freedom in use at the National Centers for Environmental Prediction. This suggests that the LIM can also be used to diagnose the statistics of observed low-frequency variability. And in fact, the LIM is able to reproduce the observed lagged covariability statistics of low-frequency variability remarkably well. This quantity is badly simulated by both barotropic and baroclinic models linearized about the time-mean flow. Diabatic heating is critical to this correct temporal simulation. The spatial structure of the stochastic forcing necessary to maintain variability is discussed and compared to that required in simpler models. The energy balance of the variability is analyzed to quantify the relative importance of the different mechanisms which contribute to variability.
- Indicates paper has been withdrawn from meeting
- Indicates an Award Winner