The NOGAPS model and its adjoint are used to demonstrate the inappropriateness of various response functions typically used to define TC intensity. Perturbations to initial conditions in regions of high sensitivity are used to facilitate dynamical interpretation of the sensitivity gradients, and several response functions used to define TC intensity are tested for their utility. Several response functions based on low-level vorticity and kinetic energy in the region of the TC are shown to be sensitive to perturbations to the location of the TC and its surrounding environment within the response function box, yielding a change to the response function without significantly affecting the intensity of the TC itself. Response functions describing specific processes related to TC intensification (e.g. vertical motion leading to the stretching of the air column) are shown to be more successful, but these response functions constrain sensitivity gradients to only focus on the one aspect of TC intensification described by the response function.