J1.7 Are satellite retrieved aerosol radiative properties a suitable proxy for cloud condensation nuclei?

Tuesday, 8 July 2014: 3:00 PM
Essex Center/South (Westin Copley Place)
Philip Stier, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom

Aerosol-cloud interactions remain a key uncertainty in the climate system. The large uncertainties associated with their representation in global aerosol climate models have emphasised the need for observational studies. In-situ measurements provide a detailed description of aerosol and cloud microphysical properties, providing strong observational constraints on aerosol cloud interactions. However, their spatio-temporal sampling is sparse so that “observational” estimates of global aerosol cloud interactions generally rely on co-located satellite retrievals of aerosol radiative properties and cloud properties.

In this study I critically evaluate the suitability of satellite retrieved aerosol radiative properties, such as aerosol optical depth (AOD), aerosol index (AI) and aerosol fine mode optical depth, as proxy for cloud condensation nuclei (CCN).

This analysis combines a fully self-consistent calculation of aerosol radiative properties and CCN in the aerosol climate model ECHAM-HAM with an extensive collection of in-situ measured CCN data harmonised in the GASSP project, spatio-temporally collocated to satellite retrieved aerosol radiative properties. Correlating ECHAM-HAM simulated aerosol radiative properties with CCN at a range of supersaturations (sampling different sizes/composition of the aerosol spectrum) highlights limitations in the suitability of AOD and AI as proxy for CCN. These discrepancies arise from a range of factors, including the limited representativeness of column-integrated aerosol radiative properties for surface or cloud-base CCN as well as the effects of humidity growth of aerosols, affecting AOD/AI but not CCN. Similarly, also the correlation of in-situ measured CCN data shows only limited correlation at the local scale, adding spatio-temporal sampling issues. These results highlight limitations of “observational” estimates of aerosol cloud interactions from remote-sensing.

- Indicates paper has been withdrawn from meeting
- Indicates an Award Winner