The NASA CloudSat (W-band radar) and CALIPSO (NdYAG lidar) active observing system missions, which have flown as part of the A-Train since Spring 2006, provide an unprecedented global dataset of cloud boundary (base, top, multi-layer) and internal water content structure information. Due to the non-scanning nature of these observing systems, the observations are limited to a 2-D cross section along the ground track, and therefore provide no direct information on the surrounding cloud field. At the head of the A-Train constellation, on board the Aqua satellite, is the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) instrument. A passive radiometer with 36 narrow bands in the optical spectrum, MODIS provides the necessary information to determine cloud type, cloud top properties, and cloud water path over a 2330 km swath. What it cannot provide is the detailed vertical structure of an active observing system.
This research appeals to the synergy of A-Train observations to enable new capabilities unattainable from the individual components. Here, we present a new technique to estimate cloud profile information from CloudSat/CALIPSO/MODIS observations. The approach uses cloud class-dependent statistics to relate the limited active sensor data to the regional cloud field observed by MODIS. This work addresses the following science questions: How useful and robust is cloud classification information in the context of understanding cloud vertical structure? What is the spatial variability of cloud base and top as a function of these cloud classifications, and can this variability be used as a basis for relating a reduced set of observations to a broader region? How can we quantify the uncertainty of predictions based on such an approach in a way that makes them useful in the context of model validation and decision support systems?
Early results from this work indicate that there is skill in combining the active and passive measurements to translate 2-D swath information into 3-D cloud fields (for the topmost cloud layer). Applications of these enhanced' cloud fields to aviation and forecast model validation, as well as limitations of the approach, will be discussed.