Planned and Inadvertent Weather Modification/Weather Modification Association


An ‘aerosol effect' detected but precipitation not affected

Edward E. Hindman, The City Univ. of New York, New York, NY

A 23-year record (1983/84-2005/06) of wintertime measurements at Storm Peak Laboratory (SPL) in the northern Colorado Rocky Mountains has shown, on average, condensation nucleus concentrations were directly related to cloud droplet concentrations and the droplet concentrations were inversely related to droplet mean diameters, evidence of an ‘aerosol effect'. With the removal of two outlying precipitation rate values, the droplet mean diameters were directly related to the precipitation rates; the mean diameters and precipitation rates are related through snow crystal riming. These results suggest aerosol concentrations can affect precipitation rates at SPL. However, there was no trend in either precipitation rates or in seasonal precipitation. Apparently, precipitation was governed more by meteorological factors than by aerosol concentrations.

extended abstract  Extended Abstract (840K)

wrf recording  Recorded presentation

Session 12, Aerosol Impacts on Clouds and Precipitation
Wednesday, 23 April 2008, 3:00 PM-4:30 PM, Standley I

Previous paper  

Browse or search entire meeting

AMS Home Page