Presentation PDF (311.9 kB)
Reducing sampling error is important to atmospheric budgets and inversions, which are preferred in mountainous regions because measuring CO2 flux using contemporary eddy covariance techniques in mountainous terrain can lead to regionally unrepresentative results. Coupled transport-biosphere inverse models such as CarbonTracker optimize CO2 flux estimates by assimilating CO2 concentration data across a network of in situ sensors. These inverse methods are limited by the representativeness and coverage of assimilated data, which underscores the importance of reducing sampling error in CO2 concentration data.
To examine our capacity to identify CO2 observations made during well-mixed conditions we tested three discrete-time filters. The first filter, a combined sample error and detection error filter, is a convenient routine that identifies anomalies by excessive hourly variance and by variance of simultaneous measurements across multiple inlet heights on the tower. The second method, statistical interpolation, filters for near global scale (baseline) CO2 observations using an iterative approach. The final method is an efficient filter that uses a dynamically determined window size. We use a set of statistical metrics to analyze the differences and agreement among methods, their product time series, their power spectra. Additionally differences for several case studies of synoptic and local scale events are presented.