Here, we investigate the effect of different grid nesting configurations and the choice of turbulence model on predictions of wind speed at a west coast wind farm. Preliminary results show that nesting down to finer resolutions does not significantly improve model results compared to field observations for days with strong synoptic forcing such as frontal passages. There is only slight improvement in the results when comparing coarser to finer vertical resolution. A comparison between two-way nesting, where the finer grid feeds information back to the parent, and one-way nesting does not yield significant differences either. On the other hand, the model results appear sensitive to the choice of turbulence model. We will examine “mixed models”, which combine an eddy-viscosity component with a scale-similarity component and have shown improved representation of shear-generated turbulence in other work. These results for synoptically-forced conditions will be compared to days dominated by local forcing to determine when higher resolution is beneficial at this particular wind farm.
- Indicates paper has been withdrawn from meeting
- Indicates an Award Winner