1A.4 Foehn jets over the Larsen C Ice Shelf, Antarctica

Monday, 9 June 2014: 9:45 AM
Queens Ballroom (Queens Hotel)
Andrew D. Elvidge, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom; and I. A. Renfrew, J. C. King, A. Orr, T. Lachlan-Cope, M. Weeks, and S. L. Gray

Previously unknown foehn jets have been identified to the east of the Antarctic Peninsula above the Larsen C Ice Shelf. These jets have major implications for the east coast of the AP, a region of rapid climatic warming and where two large sections of ice shelf have collapsed in recent years. During three foehn events across the Antarctic Peninsula, leeside warming and drying is seen in new aircraft observations and simulated by the Met Office Unified Model (MetUM) at ~1.5 km grid spacing. In case A weak southwesterly flow and an elevated upwind inversion characterise a highly non-linear flow regime with upwind flow blocking. In case C strong northwesterly winds characterise a relatively linear case with little upwind flow blocking. Case B resides somewhere between the two in flow regime linearity. The foehn jets – apparent in aircraft observations where available and MetUM simulations of all three cases – are mesoscale features (up to 60 km in width) originating from the mouths of leeside inlets. Through back trajectory analysis they are identified as a type of gap flow. In Cases A and B the jets are distinct, being strongly accelerated relative to the background flow, and confined to low levels above the Larsen C Ice Shelf. They resemble the ‘shallow foehn' of the Alps. Case C resembles a case of ‘deep foehn', with the jets less distinct. The foehn jets are considerably cooler and moister relative to adjacent regions of calmer foehn air. In cases A and B this is due to lower upwind source regions for the jets, associated with the non-linear flow regime and upwind flow blocking. In the more linear case C it is due to less diabatic warming and precipitation along the jet trajectories due to the reduced ascent of air upwind of the mountain passes.
- Indicates paper has been withdrawn from meeting
- Indicates an Award Winner