Wednesday, 28 June 2017: 8:30 AM
Salon G-I (Marriott Portland Downtown Waterfront)
With the aim of contributing to the improvement of subgrid-scale gravity wave (GW) parameterizations in numerical weather prediction and climate models, the comparative relevance in GW drag of direct GW–mean flow interactions and turbulent wave breakdown are investigated. Of equal interest is how well Wentzel–Kramer–Brillouin (WKB) theory can capture direct wave–mean-flow interactions that are excluded by applying the steady-state approximation.WKB is implemented in a very efficient Lagrangian ray-tracing approach that considers wave-action density in phase space, thereby avoiding numerical instabilities due to caustics. It is supplemented by a simple wave-breaking scheme based on a static-instability saturation criterion. Idealized test cases of horizontally homogeneous GW packets are considered where wave-resolving large-eddy simulations (LESs) provide the reference. In all of these cases, the WKB simulations including direct GW–mean flow interactions already reproduce the LES data to a good accuracy without a wave-breaking scheme. The latter scheme provides a next-order correction that is useful for fully capturing the total energy balance between wave and mean flow. Moreover, a steady-state WKB implementation, as used in present GW parameterizations where turbulence provides, by the noninteraction paradigm, the only possibility to affect the mean flow, is much less able to yield reliable results. The GW energy is damped too strongly and induces an oversimplified mean flow. This argues for WKB approaches to GW parameterization that take wave transience into account.
Reference:
Bölöni, G., Ribstein, B., Muraschko, J., Sgoff, C., Wei, J., and U. Achatz, 2016: The Interaction between Atmospheric Gravity Waves and Large-Scale Flows: An Efficient Description beyond the Non-Acceleration Paradigm. J. Atmos. Sci., 73, 4833-4852, doi: 10.1175/JAS-D-16-0069.1
- Indicates paper has been withdrawn from meeting
- Indicates an Award Winner