Poster Session 9 |
| | Forecasting Techniques and Warning Decision Making Posters II |
| | P9.1 | A study of convective initiation failure on 22 October 2004 
Jennifer M. Laflin, NOAA/NWS, Sioux Falls, SD; and P. N. Schumacher |
| | P9.2 | Comparing techniques and reanalysis datasets when diagnosing the relative severity of convective outbreaks
Chad M. Shafer, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK ; and A. E. Mercer, M. B. Richman, L. M. Leslie, and C. A. Doswell III |
| | P9.3 | An operational approach for integrating multiple high resolution model solutions during a high impact event: the 22 May 2010 EF4 Bowdle tornado
Michael A. Fowle, NOAA/NWS, Aberdeen, SD |
| | P9.4 | Composite analysis of environmental conditions favorable for significant tornadoes across eastern Kansas
Joshua M. Boustead, NOAA/NWS, Valley, NE; and B. E. Mayes, W. Gargan, G. Phillips, and J. Leighton |
| | P9.5 | An application of a cutoff low forecaster pattern recognition model to the 30 June–2 July 2009 significant event for the Northeast
Thomas A. Wasula, NOAA/NWS, Albany, NY; and N. A. Stuart, M. Scalora, L. F. Bosart, and D. Keyser |
| | P9.6 | WSR-88D close-range sampling of neighboring supercells: a case of tornadic versus non-tornadic tendencies
Steven R. Cobb, NOAA/NWSFO, Lubbock, TX; and T. T. Lindley |
| | P9.7 | ZDR column characteristics and trends during the 10 May 2010 severe weather outbreak
Cynthia A. Van Den Broeke, CIMMS/Univ. of Oklahoma, Norman, OK; and C. D. Payne, L. R. Lemon, and P. T. Schlatter |
| | P9.8 | The impact of WSR-88D Super-Resolution data in low-level mesocyclone evaluation
James G. LaDue, NOAA/NWS, Norman, OK; and C. S. Spannagle, V. L. Holtz, and S. M. Torres |
|  | P9.9 | PAPER WITHDRAWN
|