In parallel, several studies have been carried out both off-line and in real time to further improve the Quantitative Precipitation Estimation (QPE) and to design and implement a new hydrometeor classification algorithm, still with the constraint to be applicable to X, C and S-band radars. These studies resulted in a second version of polarimetric processing chain (called V2).
The main innovation of the second version of polarimetric processing chain lies in the use of an hybrid Z-KDP estimator in rain and hail, where a standard Z-R relationship (Marshall-Palmer) is used at low KDP (typically 1°km-1) and a R-KDP relationship is used at higher KDP. KDP is estimated through a linear regression performed over the range profile of ΦDP, which is filtered using a running 6 km median filter in a previous step. Moreover, the new dual-polarization processing chain uses a fuzzy logic hydrometeor classification algorithm that takes into account data-based membership functions, measurement conditions and temperature information. The formulation of the algorithm is unique for X, C, S-band radars and employs wavelength-adapted bivariate membership functions for (ZH, ZDR), (ZH, KDP) and (ZH, ρHV) established using real data collected by the French polarimetric radars and T-matrix simulations. As for V1, work had to be done to properly interface the second version of polarimetric processing chain (V2) with the many modules composing the complex QPE algorithm (ground-clutter identification, partial beam blocking correction, vertical profile of reflectivity correction, estimation of a quality index, estimation and application of a radar rain gauge calibration factor, ). Finally, what-if questions had to be addressed, such as : what if one TR tube falls down and the radar has to be run is single-polarization only ?
The evaluation was done at X, C and S-band by comparing hourly QPE obtained with V1 and V2 against rain gauges on a large number different [radar;event] couples. The evaluation shows a clear improvement of the QPE produced by V2 compared to V1. The level of improvement is more important at X-band than at C-band and more important at C-band than at S-band.