More relevant to this conference than this story is actually what allowed us to be able to tell it, namely 1) what processing was done to the radar data to vividly illustrate what happened, and 2) what made the raw observations from the Canadian radar in many ways superior to that of the more sensitive WSR-88D to the south. In particular, the Canadian radar was able to observe these low flying moths over twice the area that the WSR88D could thanks to its high-perched location and its use of negative elevation angles, allowing it to detect phenomena in the boundary layer over a much broader area regardless of the radar’s weaker sensitivity. Despite the enhanced clutter that this radar experiences, we were also able to considerably clean the images by using a combination of satellite imagery, data at multiple elevation angles, and both less-sensitive clutter-filtered and more-sensitive unfiltered scans. Given the interest of the meteorological community in threatening low-level phenomena, the experience we gathered suggest that we may want to reconsider our tendency to avoid putting radar on elevated terrain and scanning at negative angles.