84th AMS Annual Meeting

Sunday, 11 January 2004
Intercomparison of Cloud Base Height at the ARM Southern Great Plains Site
Room 608/609
Christina P. Kalb, Oklahoma Weather Center Research Experience for Undergraduates, Columbus, OH; and A. Dean, R. Peppler, and K. Sonntag
Instruments that measure cloud base height at the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Program site in Lamont and Blackwell Oklahoma are compared. These instruments include, the Micropulse Lidar, Belfort Laser Ceilometer, Vaisala Ceilometer, and Millimeter-Wavelength Cloud Radar. ARM Program instruments record information regarding cloud radiative forcing and feedback effects, variables that represent a great amount of uncertainty in climate prediction. However, flawed observations and dissimilarities in instrument performance hinder our ability to fully understand these processes. Also, users of ARM data assume these cloud observing instruments are interchangeable, but this is not be the case. The purpose of this paper is to address the observed differences between cloud base measuring instruments under different atmospheric conditions and cloud types, both qualitatively and statistically, and to test a method that may be useful to identify outliers.

Qualitative analysis revealed that the Micropulse Lidar is superior in reporting high cloud bases and jagged cloud bases, but inferior to both ceilometers when reporting low clouds. However, statistical results were inconclusive, due to large standard deviations encountered in all cloud episodes. Histograms used to identify outliers gave reasonable results when cloud bases were visibly similar, but resulted in skewed or bimodal distributions for other cases. These results are discussed for observations taken during ARM’s Spring 2000 Cloud Intensive Observing Period.

Supplementary URL: