Tuesday, 13 January 2009: 9:15 AM
Comparison of ERA-Interim and ERA-40 reanalyses with observations over river basins
Room 127BC (Phoenix Convention Center)
The changes between the ERA-40 and ERA-Interim reanalyses in the seasonal cycle of temperature, precipitation and evaporation, the surface radiation budget and the cloud fields are evaluated over three river basins, the Amazon, Mississippi and Mackenzie, for the period 1990-2001, using a variety of surface observational datasets and the ISCCP data. In ERA-Interim over the Amazon, the unrealistic interannual drift of precipitation has been reduced, and annual precipitation is largely unbiased, although the seasonal amplitude of precipitation remains too small. However, ERA-Interim has a large cold 2-m temperature bias. The clear-sky surface shortwave flux in ERA-Interim is lower than in ERA-40, and closer to observations. Low cloud cover has increased dramatically in ERA-Interim, and total reflective cloud cover has a larger positive bias in comparison with observations. The ratio of the surface short wave cloud forcing to the precipitation heating of the atmosphere is much lower in the observations than both reanalyses. The diurnal cycle of precipitation has improved somewhat with the removal of a spurious early morning peak. For the Mississippi and Mackenzie, the spinup of precipitation in 24h forecasts has been greatly reduced. Temperature biases are small in both reanalyses, but summer precipitation and evaporation exceed observational estimates. For the Mississippi, reflective cloud cover in ERA-Interim has increased in winter and decreased in summer compared with ERA-40, giving a closer fit to the observations in both seasons. For the Mackenzie, similar reflective cloud changes in ERA-Interim improve the fit to the observations in summer but not in winter.