To assess the standalone performance of the VIIRS OCC algorithm we have used a combination of global synthetic and in situ IOP-AOP datasets. The two synthetic datasets used for assessing OCC performance are based on in-water radiative transfer simulations using different versions of the widely accepted Hydrolight ocean radiative transfer model (RTM) independently developed by NGST and by the International Ocean-Color Coordinating Group (IOCCG). The in situ datasets include the NASA bio-Optical Marine Algorithm Dataset (NOMAD), Version 1.3, and the IOCCG In Situ Dataset, which is an extraction from NASA's SeaWiFS Bio-optical Archive and Storage System used for the cross-comparison of IOP algorithms reported in IOCCG Report No. 5. These datasets contain biogeochemical values (e.g., chlorophyll and chlorophyll-a concentrations), absorption and scattering IOP values, and AOP values such as the spectral water-leaving radiance, surface irradiance, and remote-sensing reflectance. This information plus auxiliary values of latitude, longitude and sea-surface temperature are all that is required to assess the standalone performance of the VIIRS OCC algorithm.
From standalone testing of the VIIRS OCC algorithm with both global synthetic and in situ datasets, we have found that the algorithm appears to be working correctly and that it achieves performance measures that are comparable to other state-of-science ocean color algorithms. The precision error achievable with the OCC algorithm is consistent with that obtained from sensors like MODIS and SeaWiFS. There appears to be a small slope bias in the retrieval of chlorophyll-a with the current VIIRS OCC algorithm. This has been observed with both synthetic and real, in situ data. The retrieval performance of the absorption IOP, IOP-a, by the OCC algorithm appears to be quite good, equaling or exceeding the performance of most of the state-of-science algorithms reported in IOCCG Report No. 5. Retrieval performance for the particle backscattering IOP, IOP-bpb, is still somewhat uncertain. While the performance results on the NGST synthetic dataset appears to be respectable, the performance on the IOCCG synthetic data was only marginal. Since there was no in situ data available with IOP-bpb truth, it is not clear whether the difference in observed performance is due to the data or a problem with the algorithm.
Supplementary URL: