In this paper we will describe two NPOESS VIIRS IR algorithms used to retrieve microphysical properties for water and ice clouds during nighttime conditions. Both algorithms employ four VIIRS IR channels: M12 (3.7 ƒÝm), M14 (8.55 ƒÝm), M15 (10.7 ƒÝm) and M16 (12 ƒÝm). The physical basis for the two algorithms is similar in that while the Cloud Top Temperature (CTT) is derived from M14 and M16 for ice clouds the Cloud Optical Thickness (COT) and Cloud Effective Particle Size (CEPS) are derived from M12 and M15. The two algorithms depart in the different radiative transfer parameterization equations used for ice and water clouds. Both the VIIRS nighttime IR algorithms and the CERES split-window method employ the 3.7 ƒÝm and 10.7 ƒÝm bands for cloud optical properties retrievals, apparently based on similar physical principles but with different implementations. It is reasonable to expect that the VIIRS and CERES IR algorithms produce comparable performance and similar limitations.

To demonstrate the VIIRS nighttime IR algorithm performance, we will select a number of test cases using NASA MODIS L1b radiance products as proxy input data for VIIRS. The VIIRS retrieved COT and CEPS will then be compared to cloud products available from the MODIS, NASA CALIPSO, CloudSat and CERES sensors. For the MODIS product, the nighttime cloud emissivity will serve as an indirect comparison to VIIRS COT. For the CALIPSO and CloudSat products, the layered COT will be used for direct comparison. Finally, the CERES products will provide direct comparison with COT as well as CEPS. This study can only provide a qualitative assessment of the VIIRS IR algorithms due to the large uncertainties in these cloud products.