2.2
The revised Davenport roughness classification for cities and sheltered country
Alan Davenport, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada; and C. S. B. Grimmond, T. Oke, and J. Wieringa
Surface roughness knowledge is needed for most boundary layer analysis and modelling, but for applications it is seldom available from local measurements. To estimate roughness visually or from maps, Davenport (Am.Soc.Civ.Eng., 1960) classified all the then available well-exposed profile data for a wide range of terrain. Wieringa (Bull.Am.Met.Soc., 1980; J. Wind Eng.Ind.Aer., 1992) validated Davenport's eight roughness classes for open and moderately rough terrain and for forests, and extended its range to smooth terrain and open water. The classification is widely used, e.g. by WMO. Recently, more good experimental roughness data have become available for cities (Grimmond and Oke, Bound.Layer Met., 1998; J.Appl.Met., 1999), as well as for very heterogeneous landscapes from tethered balloon observations in Britain and in the Sahel. This made it possible to validate the high-roughness classes more fully. Some shifts in roughness class descriptions prove to be necessary in order to account for differences in turbulence generation between bluff buildings and porous vegetation. A slightly reformulated Davenport roughness classification is presented. It gives us a field-validated working tool to estimate effective aerodynamic roughness across the full range of real world terrain for application in wind engineering and boundary layer modelling over non-complex terrain.
Session 2, Urban winds and turbulence 1
Tuesday, 15 August 2000, 10:30 AM-12:00 PM
Previous paper Next paper