The systematic strategy, developed by Majda et al. (1999, 2001, 2002, 2003) and Franzke et al. (2005) consists first of the identification of slowly evolving climate modes and faster evolving non-climate modes by use of an empirical orthogonal function decomposition and by minimal regression fitting of the unresolved modes. The stochastic climate model predicts the evolution of these climate modes only. Since the climate system is governed by nonlinear equations the interactions of the resolved climate modes with the unresolved non-climate modes have to be taken into account. The low-order stochastic climate model predicts the evolution of these climate modes a priori without any regression fitting of the resolved modes. The systematic stochastic mode reduction strategy determines all correction terms and noises with minimal regression fitting of the variances and correlation times of the unresolved modes. These correction terms and noises account for the neglected interactions between the resolved climate modes and the unresolved non-climate modes. No ad hoc damping is necessary as in previous studies. All additional interaction terms are predicted which include constant forcing terms, linear terms, quadratic and cubic nonlinear terms, as well as additive and multiplicative (state dependent) noises. These additional interaction terms describe the interaction of the resolved with the unresolved modes in a rigorous systematic way.
The stochastic models reproduce the geographical distributions of the variances and transient eddy forcing well. Also the decay of the autocorrelation functions and the PDFs are captured reasonably well. These results provide evidence of effective stochastic dynamics in climate. Furthermore, the stochastic mode reduction strategy reveals fundamental differences between the barotropic and the baroclinic models. While the reduced stochastic model of the barotropic model is essentially linear with additive noise, the reduced stochastic model of the 3 layer quasi-geostrophic model is dominated by both linear and nonlinear dynamics and by both additive and multiplicative noises. The dynamical implications of these differences as well as different optimal basis function strategies will be discussed.