Friday, 17 June 2005: 3:25 PM
Ballroom A (Hyatt Regency Cambridge, MA)
A study is undertaken of the difference between the forecast and contemporaneous analysis fields of a particular weather prediction system. The evolution of this pseudo-error field is examined and interpreted from a PV-perspective, and the underlying rationale is two fold. First this perspectives intrinsic properties imply that:- (i) non-conservation of error PV signifies either isentropic advection of the error across an ambient flow's PV-gradient, the misrepresentation of diabatic or frictional processes, and/or error in the analysis field at the verification time; and (ii) inversion of a particular feature of the error PV field can (- via attribution) account for error of a primary flow variable in the in-situ and far-field. Second the dynamics of rapid error growth has been linked to distinctive PV-features of the error field (e.g. via vertical realignment of either initially backward slanting monochromatic columns of error PV or initially compact vertically-stacked PV error features of differing sign. Illustrations are proffered of the structure and evolution of the PV difference field derived from the ECMWF's prediction suite, and include:- (a) the apparent inadequate development of the Rossby wave amplitude at the extratropical tropopause, and (b) a misforecast of a cyclone associated with deficient diabatic effects and a realignment of tropospheric PV error. The illustrations suggest that the approach provides a compact and insightful description of the difference field's dynamics.
- Indicates paper has been withdrawn from meeting
- Indicates an Award Winner