12th Conference on Atmospheric Radiation


Satellite-Derived Cloud Property Errors and Their Effect on Computed Domain-averaged Irradiances with a 1D Radiative Transfer Model

Seiji Kato, Hampton University, Hampton, VA; and L. M. Hinkelman and A. Cheng

The process of retrieving cloud optical thickness and effective radius from radiances measured by satellite instruments is simulated to determine the error in both the retrieved properties and in the irradiances computed from them. The radiances at 0.64 mu m and 3.7 mu m are computed for three cloud fields -- stratus, stratocumulus, and cumulus-- generated by large eddy simulation models. When overcast pixels are assumed and the horizontal flux is neglected in the retrieval process, the error in the domain averaged retrieved optical thickness from nadir is 1% to -32% (1% to -27%) and the error in the retrieved effective radius is 0% to 67% (0% to 63%) for the solar zenith angle of 30 degree (50 degree). Using the radiance averaged over a 1 km size pixel also introduces error in the optical thickness because of the non-linear relation between the reflected radiance and optical thickness. Both optical thickness and effective radius errors increase with increasing horizontal inhomogeneity, which is expressed by the shape parameter of a gamma distribution fitted to the retrieved optical thickness. When the 0.64 mu m albedo is computed with the independent column approximation using retrieved properties from nadir (oblique) view for a solar zenith angle of 50 degree, the error is -0.3% to 14% (-5% to -30%) relative to the albedo from 3D radiative transfer computations with the true cloud properties. The albedo error occurs even though the radiance at one angle is forced to agree because a plane parallel cloud with a fixed optical thickness and effective radius cannot consistently match the true radiance angular distribution. In addition, the error in the retrieved cloud properties contributes to the albedo error. When albedos computed with cloud properties derived from nadir and oblique views are averaged, the albedo error can partially cancel. The absolute error in the narrowband 0.64 mu m (3.7 mu m) albedo averaged over a 1 degree by 1 degree domain is less than 1.5% (0.6%), 5.0% (4.1%), and 7.1% (11%) in order of increasing inhomogeneity, when albedos computed with cloud properties derived from viewing zenith angles between 0 degree and 60 degree are averaged and when the solar zenith angle is between 10 degree and 50 degree. When the solar zenith angle is 70 degree, the error increases to up to +24% (+37%) for all three scenes.

Poster Session 4, Radiation Poster Session IV: Remote Sensing
Wednesday, 12 July 2006, 5:00 PM-7:00 PM, Grand Terrace

Previous paper  Next paper

Browse or search entire meeting

AMS Home Page