Thursday, 17 May 2001: 8:30 AM
David W. Pierce, SIO/Univ. of California, La Jolla, CA; and T. P. Barnett, A. J. Miller, N. Schneider, and E. V. Yulaeva
The great expanse of the North Pacific is a natural place
to look for air-sea interactions that drive important
climate variability. This is especially so in light of the
strong low-frequency variability that is observed in the
North Pacific, as exemplified by the pronounced climate
shift in the region that occurred in the late 1970s.
Results from most modeling studies are consistent with the
interpretation that the majority of this variability comes
from simple thermodynamic forcing of the ocean by the
atmosphere. A sensitive test of this paradigm is to see to
what degree the observed relationships between the ocean
and atmosphere can be forced by specifying oceanic
conditions in model studies. We show the results of such a
test, using the observed relationship between the North
Pacific Oscillation (NPO), ENSO, and wintertime climate
over North America as a diagnostic, to determine to what
extent this relationship is conditioned by North Pacific
ocean temperatures.
Modifications to the simple thermodynamic picture that
arise from ocean dynamics are generally confined to the
western boundary region. In particular, ocean anomalies in
the region where the western boundary current separates
from the coast are influenced by basin-wide processes.
There is some model evidence that the atmosphere can be
influenced by oceanic processes in this region, at least
locally. In this case, it is modifications to the
ocean-atmosphere heat flux that are most directly
responsible for the atmospheric response, which suggests
that specified heat-flux anomaly experiments are valuable
for understanding this interaction. The results of such
experiments are shown, and demonstrate that heat flux
forcing in key regions can have effects that are not
entirely captured by fixed-SST experiments.
- Indicates paper has been withdrawn from meeting
- Indicates an Award Winner