5.3
Comparison of wavelet and eddy-covariance techniques for computation of fluxes in intermittent turbulence over a mountain basin
Sandra Cardon, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY; and R. D. Kelly, D. Leon, D. Vickers, and L. Mahrt
In February and March of 2003, the NCAR ISFF tower and the Wyoming King Air (WKA) were used for turbulence and eddy flux measurements over the North Park mountain basin, in northern Colorado. The tower was used to collect data at several levels ranging from 1 to 30 m AGL. The WKA was used primarily for repeated passes along a low-level flight line (about 60 m AGL) about 12 km in length and passing over the tower. Analyses thus far have focused on several days when the WKA flights spanned the transition from nighttime to daytime (buoyantly stable to unstable), in an environment where turbulence and fluxes were also effected by varying snow cover, vegetation, terrain (in the form of a ridge just south of the flight line), and cloud cover, as well as mesoscale circulations shed off the high mountains surrounding the basin.
Wavelet analysis, using the non-orthogonal Morlet basis, have been used to examine what was often intermittent, and at least non-stationary, turbulence and eddy fluxes using the repeated, low-level passes of the WKA. Wavelets are used to describe the occurrence and scale of the turbulence and resulting fluxes. Wavelet co-spectra are integrated to estimate the eddy fluxes of sensible heat, water vapor, and momentum. Integrations over some portion of the spectra are used to examine fluxes at various scales and locations. Estimates obtained from the wavelets are compared with those from several other “traditional” eddy-covariance techniques, including 1) covariances are calculated for a fixed-length window that is moved along the flightline, and 2) covariances are calculated for 100-m intervals along the flight line, and then averaged over several lengths. In both these latter cases, the window size and the averaging length cause some degree of high-pass filtering. Comparison with the wavelet fluxes should tell what effect this has on the fluxes.
Finally, principal component analysis (PCA) has been applied to the WKA data as an alternative method to compute the fluxes and in particular, to examine the role of spatially-locked components in driving or modulating fluxes along the flight-line. Prior to this analysis, the high-rate WKA data are mapped relative to the flight line and interpolated onto a regular grid. The principal components are then determined from the covariance matrix based on all of the low-level flight legs for a single case. The contribution from the first few principal components to the various fluxes should provide insight into the relative importance of mesoscale and terrain-induced motions as compared to the smaller-scale turbulent fluxes calculated using conventional eddy covariance methods with a fixed window.
Session 5, Boundary Layers in Complex Terrain: Part I
Tuesday, 29 August 2006, 8:30 AM-10:00 AM, Ballroom South
Previous paper Next paper