We propose a "cell-based" scoring method for downburst events that simulates how a forecaster might use the DDPDA output in the warning decision-making process. Since the precursors to downburst events are extremely short-lived, the DDPDA may only issue a downburst prediction for a short period of time (frequently one volume scan or 5 minutes), while other algorithms may issue warning output for 30 minutes or more. The "cell-based" scoring method allows each storm cell to be identified with a correct prediction, incorrect prediction, missed event, or correct non-prediction. In addition, a lead time can be calculated from the DDPDA-issued downburst prediction and the event time.
We extend this method to compare historical thunderstorm warnings issued by the National Weather Service and downburst predictions issued by the DDPDA. The data set used in this evaluation includes approximately 75 severe downburst events and 1000 non-severe cells from 40 separate days. Through this process, we plan to determine if the DDPDA would improve the warning verification scores of forecasters in various historical events.