To assess the impact of this new data set on ISC modeled concentrations, we determined the frequency of cloud reports in this "missing" layer based on 30 years of pre-ASOS weather reports (1961 through 1990) from first order stations in North Carolina. We then calculated and compared ambient air concentrations from a hypothetical facility comparing pre- and post-ASOS data bases. This paper presents the results of this comparison.
In addition, to illustrate the significance of the differences resulting from using "nearby" instead of "distant" sites, we offer example comparisons based on the existing North Carolina modeling guidelines.
The Environmental Protection Agency's Guideline on Air Quality Models (Revised) suggests that proximity of meteorological data, especially considering terrain differences, is the priority in air quality modeling. North Carolina's geography presents a variety of mesoscale conditions, and , therefore, closer, more representative ASOS data are more representative than distant data. We propose ASOS data be adopted as the standard meteorological data set for ISC and similar models.
- Indicates paper has been withdrawn from meeting
- Indicates an Award Winner