A comparison of cloud microphysical parameters from clean and polluted samples showed that it is possible to interpret changes in effective radius. Questions about changes in optical depth and liquid water path are much more difficult to address for two reasons. The horizontal inhomogeneity of cloud fields results in an underestimate of optical depth and hence, liquid water path, and this bias depends on the degree of variability which need not be the same for different samples. In addition, non-adiabatic effects could also vary from sample to sample. Nevertheless, with these two caveats, a global analysis using satellite data and transport model output can be used to constrain some of the uncertainties in the magnitude of the indirect aerosol radiative effect on the Earth's radiation budget.