Several new estimates of annual and monthly mean values of continental freshwater discharge into the individual and global oceans at 1 degree resolution are compared. While the best estimate is that calibrated with actual discharge gauge measurements, estimates based on the atmospheric moisture budget and the inferred evaporation E minus precipitation P, have potential through being able to provide time series. Atmospheric reanalyses from the National Centers for Environmental Prediction/National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCEP/NCAR) and the European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) are used along with a snow melt model and a river routing model to estimate the continental discharge. The discharge and its latitudinal distribution implied by the observation-based runoff and the ECMWF reanalysis-based P-E agree well with the river-based estimates, whereas the discharge implied by the NCEP/NCAR reanalysis-based P-E has a negative bias. Tests are made using independent estimates of P and the implied E, as well as the requirement that P should exceed E over land except where surface flow allows otherwise, such as Southern California. Results suggest that the P-E data from reanalyses may be used to study the interannual to decadal variations in continental discharge.