S195 False Alarms in the Satellite-Based IR Difference: When Maritime Low Clouds are Overstated at Night

Sunday, 28 January 2024
Hall E (The Baltimore Convention Center)
Jesse David Turner, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO; and S. D. Miller, Y. J. Noh, W. Line, and C. D. Kummerow

Due to the relative lack of data over the ocean, marine boundary layer (MBL) clouds are particularly difficult to measure. Environmental satellites are the best way to collect data on the properties of these low clouds. During the daytime, MBL clouds can be seen in the visible spectrum, but at night, infrared (IR) methods are typically used. These IR methods include a 11-3.9 μm brightness temperature difference (BTD) common to many operational cloud masks. However, it has recently been demonstrated that under certain conditions, these simple methods can indicate the presence of low cloud when none in fact exists. This false alarm low-cloud issue was first discovered by comparing operational cloud mask products (downstream of the IR methods) to a novel low-light visible imagery of moonlight reflection from the Visible/Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) Day/Night Band (DNB). This presentation describes the physical basis for these false alarms, and determines the regions most at risk of experiencing this false cloud effect. Also described are the potential consequences of regional-scale biases on the products reliant on accurate nighttime cloud masks. Foremost among the impacted products is the sea-surface temperature (SST) climate data record.
- Indicates paper has been withdrawn from meeting
- Indicates an Award Winner