In this presentation, we will further define vulnerability as it is related to hazardous weather, explain why a one-size fits all approach does not work for mapping vulnerabilities related to hazardous weather, and discuss how understanding these vulnerabilities benefits NWS WFOs through use in training, operations, and impact-based decision support services (IDSS). We also briefly compare the BVOT to other GIS vulnerability datasets, such as the CDC’s Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), which utilizes U.S. Census data to calculate a vulnerability score for census tracts, and FEMA’s Resilience Analysis and Planning Tool (RAPT), which includes over 100 preloaded layers and contains data on weather hazards and risks, as well as the most current census demographic data and infrastructure data. We will explain how the BVOT is different from these other ways to display vulnerability data in the form of weather hazard-specific layers, which can be viewed together with other hazard layers and models in AWIPS. Next, we will present ways in which EMs, NWS forecasters, and warning coordination meteorologists (WCMs) have discussed vulnerabilities during both in-person and online group discussions held with participating NWS WFOs. We will also discuss how researchers explained BVOT vulnerabilities to participants through the lens of the “people, places, and things that keep you up at night.” Finally, this presentation concludes by discussing potential ways in which vulnerability data, in the form of the BVOT and other GIS vulnerability datasets, can be used by WFOs, including: training and onboarding new meteorologists, use by backup WFOs, relationship building with core partners, uses in operations and warning messaging, and IDSS. We argue that by understanding the “people, places, and things” that are most vulnerable to hazardous weather within a CWA, WFOs can provide more targeted communication to the partners they serve.

