This talk will address the differences between three IMPACTS cyclones, featuring long structures along a cold frontal boundary on 4 February 2022, small transient structures in the comma head of a developing cyclone on 17 February 2022, and medium-sized structures on the backside of a departing mature cyclone on 23 January 2023. The high-altitude ER-2 and the in-situ P-3 aircraft flew coordinated legs for each case. To provide environmental context, WRF version 4.4 was configured and run for the duration of each event. The WRF, rawinsondes, and reanalysis are used to investigate the role of shear, frontogenetical lift, and instability in generating and maintaining these precipitation features. MRMS reflectivity, the ER-2 downward pointing radars, and the P-3 cloud probes will be used to understand the microphysical structure.
Preliminary results show that WRF lacks mid-sized precipitation features, and they are more amorphous than their MRMS counterparts. Conditional and potential instability is typically found near cloud top, above the layer of sloping frontogenesis, in the vicinity of these features. Slantwise instability near cloud top is found to be ubiquitous in all three cases and is likely not a sufficient cause for band formation. An analysis of dual frequency ratio and particle size distributions suggests that particles grow through aggregation as they fall out from generating cells near cloud top, and are organized into band-like structures at the surface. Sensitivity tests show that increasing horizontal or vertical resolution both improve the structure of these objects in WRF for the 17 February 2022 case. It is hypothesized that the higher horizontal and vertical resolution improves the depiction of cloud-top generating cells, which are necessary for the formation of bands.
- Indicates paper has been withdrawn from meeting
- Indicates an Award Winner