Session 5A Snow Hydrology across Scales Via Field Measurements, Remote Sensing, and Modeling I

Tuesday, 14 January 2025: 8:30 AM-10:00 AM
209 (New Orleans Ernest N. Morial Convention Center)
Host: 39th Conference on Hydrology
Chair:
Melissa Wrzesien, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center/University of Maryland, Hydrological Sciences Lab, Greenbelt, MD
Cochairs:
Eunsang Cho, NASA GSFC, Hydrological Sciences Laboratory, Newmarket, NH; Carrie Vuyovich, GSFC, Code 617 (HSL), Greenbelt, MD and Engela Ryan Sthapit

Millions of people worldwide rely on snow accumulation and melt for water resources. However, assessing the volume of water contained in the snowpack and its spatial and temporal change can be difficult in a changing climate because snowpack is one of the fastest changing variables in hydrologic cycle. Without accurate and timely information about the snowpack at scales relevant to hydrologic processes, snow-dominant regions are particularly susceptible to flooding or drought, with broad-reaching societal and economic implications on the security of the region. Accurate estimates of snow water equivalent (SWE), snow covered area (SCA), melt timing, and other snow properties are critical in accurately predicting runoff response for water resource management and thus aspects of water, agriculture, energy, and societal stability. Remote sensing and modeling techniques provide methods for observing and detecting snow evolution, onset of snowmelt, and spatial extent. Existing and novel remote sensing techniques have been employed to observe snow characteristics. Local and regional snow and hydrologic models have shown the ability to estimate snow properties and snowmelt-driven streamflow. In-situ datasets that drive these models with meteorological inputs and modify the model through data assimilation techniques are critical in accurately portraying snow evolution. A single sensor, field measurement, or model may not accurately represent all types of snow globally; instead, integrative approaches are needed for capturing a complete spatiotemporal understanding of snow conditions and relevant hydrological processes.

 

This session welcomes research on existing and novel methods of field measurements, remote sensing, physics-based models, and data assimilation, along with machine and deep learning for snow hydrology and relevant extreme events (e.g., floods, drought, and wildfire). We encourage submissions that aim to overcome gaps in the current knowledge of snow observation and modeling and/or consider data merging environments for integration of in situ, remote sensing, and model data.

Papers:
8:30 AM
5A.1
Snowpack to Streamflow: The Role of Snow Water Equivalent in Shaping Runoff Timing and Volume in the Lake Superior Basin
Patricia Bye, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; and A. Gronewold and J. Ward

8:45 AM
5A.2
Deployment of Enhanced Snowpack Assimilation and Physics on the Cloud to Drive Snowmelt-Driven Seasonal Water Supply Forecasts.
Logan Karsten, Airborne Snow Observatories Inc, Mammoth Lakes, CA; and D. Gochis, T. Painter, J. Deems, Y. Zhang, K. M. Sampson, M. Casali, and J. A. Grim

9:00 AM
5A.3
Recent Changes in Cold Season Precipitation Patterns in Northeast Watersheds and Their Effects on Streamflow Dynamics
Koushan Mohammadi, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT; University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT; and G. Wang

9:15 AM
5A.4
Developing a Scale-Aware Snow Cover Parameterization in the Noah-MP Land Surface Model
Cenlin He, NSF NCAR, Boulder, CO; and R. Abolafia-Rosenzweig, M. J. Barlage, and T. S. Lin

9:30 AM
5A.5
Evaluating the Performance of Operational Microphysics Parameterizations Using Observations During Significant Lake-Effect Snow Events
Abby Lynn Hutson, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Cooperative Institute for Great Lakes Research (CIGLR), Ann Arbor, MI; NOAA/GLERL, Ann Arbor, MI; and C. Pettersen, G. Mann, and A. Fujisaki-Manome

9:45 AM
5A.6
Estimating Snowfall From Lake Water Pressure: Results from Three Lakes in Humid Continental Climate
Samuel Tuttle, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY; and C. M. Beier, J. S. Mills, G. E. Gunn, I. Halm, and H. D. Pritchard

- Indicates paper has been withdrawn from meeting
- Indicates an Award Winner