Handout (117.1 kB)
This paper will discuss three primary sensors, two remote sensors and one in-situ sensor, used to measure wind profiles. Rawinsondes using Global Positioning System (GPS) wind tracking were launched 4-6 times daily providing a detailed profile of winds. A radar wind profiler (RWP) permanently deployed on the ship and corrected in real-time for ship motion, provided continuous hourly profiles at 60 and 100-m vertical resolutions. A High Resolution Doppler LIDAR (HRDL) with a 30-m along-beam resolution was operated during the experiment by NOAA's Environmental Technology Laboratory (ETL). Each instrument has its own pros and cons. This paper will compare the various methods and the unique opportunity of combining all the data into a single profile that is a much more useful representation of the winds.
Initial results show that the rawinsonde, RWP and HDRL data compare very well. Limitations with the minimum range of the RWP and possible sea- clutter contamination in the lower 0.5 km can be overcome by using the HDRL to fill in the lowest levels. In a like fashion, limited height coverage by HRDL can be compensated for by the RWP. Both the RWP and HDRL provided continuous wind profiles while the rawinsonde provides full thermodynamic and wind atmospheric profiles.