Here we report a machine learning approach that is computationally fast and reasonably accurate. Variables from our operational NWP models are carefully selected as input features. Ryerson and Hacker (2014) pointed out WRF models usually had a warm bias that lead to forecasts of zero cloud water. We found that this drawback can be compensated by machine learning models via hyperparameter tuning. As shown in Figure 1, a combination of machine learning and physical approach has achieved results better than human forecaster, especially for the recall score.
References:
Gultepe, I., R. Tardif, S. C. Michaelides, J. Cermak, A. Bott, J. Bendix, M. D. Müller, M. Pagowski, B. Hansen, G. Ellrod, W. Jacobs, G. Toth and S. G. Cober (2007). "Fog Research: A Review of Past Achievements and Future Perspectives." Pure and Applied Geophysics 164(6): 1121-1159.
Kunkel, B. A. (1984). "Parameterization of Droplet Terminal Velocity and Extinction Coefficient in Fog Models." Journal of Climate and Applied Meteorology 23(1): 34-41.
Price, J. D., S. Lane, I. A. Boutle, D. K. E. Smith, T. Bergot, C. Lac, L. Duconge, J. McGregor, A. Kerr-Munslow, M. Pickering and R. Clark (2018). "LANFEX: a field and modeling study to improve our understanding and forecasting of radiation fog." Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 0(0): in press.
Ryerson, W. R. and J. P. Hacker (2014). "The Potential for Mesoscale Visibility Predictions with a Multimodel Ensemble." Weather and Forecasting 29(3): 543-562.