Handout (3.4 MB)
The earliest usages are found in U.S, literatures on 1951 (Berger, 1951: Cressman, 1951) and possible usage of “Fujiwhara rule” in lectures presented by Herbert Riehl (1915-1997) in 1950 (Riehl et al., 1951). Riehl et al. (1951) referred this term with the adjective “famous”. On the other hand, in Japan this term became a well-known in 1964 among many people including most of meteorologists.
The interaction between two typhoons was first studied theoretically by Diro Kitao (1853-1907) (Kitao, 1889, 1895, 1897) and he presented that two cyclones rotate counterclockwise in Northern Hemisphere around the center of them. That was prominent among the Japanese meteorologists. Fujiwhara published numerous papers, including Fujiwhara (1923), about interaction between two vortexes in 1920's and 1930's with the knowledge of Kitao's studies in style of his own. It looks like that Fujiwhara have interest with growth and decay of vortexes, no interest with rotation direction. Brunt (1934) explained a theory of the growth of cyclones, by the amalgamation of vortices developed by Fujiwhara (1923) as “Fujiwhara’s vortical theory”. The other hand, Bernhard Haurzitz (1905-1986) (Haurwitz, 1930) investigated theoretically rotation of two cyclones based on Kitao’s theory (Haurwitz, 1929).
During World War II, U.S. forces were damaged by typhoons several times including twice devastation of Third Fleet. This was a motive that they established a center for typhoon tracking in Guam in June 1945 that performed aircraft reconnaissance and warning operation in North West Pacific (Guard et al, 1992).
Two typhoons (Susan and Ruth in U.S. name) that progressed slowly in the western Pacific between Okinawa and the main Japanese islands interacting each other, in late August 1945. It was believed that these typhoons postponed McArthur's occupation plan of Japan for 48 hours (Kidd and Reed, 1946, Riehl, 1954). Detailed motion of two typhoons was observed by aircraft reconnaissance. Haurwitz (1946, 1951) analyzed these data with input from Riehl, and confirmed his theory of two cyclone rotation. This case was also described as “the most spectacular example” by Riehl (1954). However, they NEVER used the term “Fujiwhara effect”.
It is inferred that therefore some experts in meteorological services in U. S. gave this process the name of a chief of meteorological service of the enemy who believes that "Kamikaze" (that is typhoon) is heaven-sent and immortalized Japan, also a meteorologist who had studied interaction between vortexes (,possibly after his death on 22 September, 1950). But Riehl and Haurwitz must know this “effect” should not be called with “Fujiwhara”.
Should we stop to use this term? It's not a problem. It is only a new example of the zeroth theorem of the history of science: a discovery (rule, regularity, insight and so on) named after someone did not originate with that person (Jackson, 2008).
References
Brunt, D. 1934: Physical and Dynamical Meteorology. London, Cambridge University Press , 406p.
Cressman, G., 1951: The Development and Motion of Typhoon “Doris” 1950. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 32, 326–333.
Fujiwhara, S., 1923: On the growth and decay of vortical systems. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 49, 75–104.
Guard, C., L. Carr, and F. Wells, 1992: Joint Typhoon Warning Center and the challenges of multibasin tropical cyclone forecasting. Weather Forecast., 7, 328–352.
Haurwitz, B., 1929: Die Arbeiten zur Dymamik der Atmosphare von Diro Kitao. Gerlands Beitr. Geophys., 21, 81–102.
Haurwitz, B., 1930: Bewegungen von Wirbeln mit vertikaler Achse und endlichem kreisförmigem Querschnitt. Zeitschrift für Phys., 60, 719–740.
Haurwitz, B., 1946: The motion of tropical cyclone pairs. Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, 658.
Haurwitz, B., 1951: The motion of binary tropical cyclones. Arch. für Meteorol. Geophys. und Bioklimatologie, Ser. A, 4, 73–86.
Jackson, J. D., 2008: Examples of the zeroth theorem of the history of science. Am. J. Phys., 76, 704, doi:10.1119/1.2904468.
Kidd, K., and C. Reed, 1946: Typhoons of the Southwest Pacific - 1945. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 27, 288–305.
Kitao, D., 1887: Beitrage zur Theorie der Bewegung der Erdatmosphare und der Wirbelsturmef. J. Coll. Sci. Imp. Univ. Japan, 1, 113–209.
Kitao, D., 1889: Beitraege zur Theorie der Bewegung der Erdatmosphare und der Wirbelsturme (Zweite Abhandlung). J. Coll. Sci. Imp. Univ. Japan, 2, 329–403.
Kitao, D., 1895: Beitrage zur Theorie der Bewegung der Erdatmosphare und der Wirbelsturme.(Dritte Abhandlung). J. Coll. Sci. Imp. Univ. Japan, 7, 293–402.
Riehl, H., J. Badner, J. E. Hovde, N. E. La Seur, L.L. Means, W. C. Palmer, M. J. Schroeder, L.W. Snellman, Chicago Forecast Center Staff, and J. E. Vederman, 1951: Forecasting in middle latitudes. Chicago, Illinois: The University of Chicago Department of Meteorology.
Riehl, H., 1954: Tropical meteorology. McGRAW-HILL BOOK COMPANY, INC.
FIG. Kitao's figure illustrates the trajectory of two cyclones rotate counterclockwise in Northern Hemisphere around the center of them with getting closer (Kitao, 1889).