364626 Representing moist convection with a collection of linear response functions

Tuesday, 14 January 2020
Hall B1 (Boston Convention and Exhibition Center)
Zhiming Kuang, Harvard Univ., Cambridge, MA

How to represent the effect of moist convection in large-scale models is a longstanding problem. A number of recent studies have shown the promise of machine learning approaches such as random forest and deep neural net (Brenowitz and Bretherton 2018; O’Gorman and Dwyer, 2018; Rasp et al., 2018). I will present an alternative trajectory piecewise linear approach based on a collection of linear response functions and discuss the pros and cons of both approaches.

References:

Brenowitz, N. D., & Bretherton, C. S. ( 2018). Prognostic validation of a neural network unified physics parameterization. Geophysical Research Letters, 45, 62896298.

O'Gorman, P. A., & Dwyer, J. G. ( 2018). Using machine learning to parameterize moist convection: Potential for modeling of climate, climate change, and extreme events. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 10, 25482563.

Rasp, S., Pritchard, M. S., & Gentine, P. ( 2018). Deep learning to represent sub‐grid processes in climate models. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 39, 96849689.

- Indicates paper has been withdrawn from meeting
- Indicates an Award Winner