To a great extent, the work that has occurred with the publics in the southeast has focused on understanding enough to provide better guidance to the weather enterprise to influence people to take better action before, during, and after the threat of tornadoes. Therefore, there has also been a focus on understanding how meteorologists, media partners, and emergency managers understand the complexities of severe convective weather in the region – partly to gather data on how they understand and cope with tornadoes, but, also, partly to determine how they interact with publics (via social media, traditional media, indirectly through EMs, and/or other forms of communication).
This presentation will summarize some of these on-going VORTEX-Southeast social science projects in order to frame the findings from our research on how NWS meteorologists in the southeast conceptualize and communicate with their partners (e.g., Emergency Managers) and their publics. The publics served by an NWS WFO are often provided the most conservative forecast because NWS meteorologists are both limited by the current state of the science and by the need to hedge overly-precise-but-more-risky forecasts. This both comes from and reinforced meteorologists' preconceptions about the behavior of publics in the southeast – when they will respond and take action, when they might ignore warnings, when they might be confused by or become passive in the face of severe weather forecasts, etc. Partners, unlike publics, are critical stakeholders who act in the interest of publics. As public safety-oriented experts and professionals, partners often expect more fine-grained and privileged insights into NWS meteorologists’ forecasts and predictions (i.e., the more precise-but-risky forecasts). These expectations, though, are often frustrated by what they perceive as the NWS meteorologists’ reluctance to provide their more fine-grained “best guess” rather than the more coarse public forecast. While “partner briefings” tend to permit NWS meteorologists more freedom to articulate more precise-but-risky forecast information, they continue to hedge on providing partners with their true “gut instinct” and “best guess” for fear that partners might not remain adequately vigilant in the face of a worst case scenario. Bringing together all of these different aspect of and conceptualizations of “the social” within the context of the broader VORTEX-Southeast initiative, this presentation will summarize progress on a tool being developed for NWS meteorologists – the Brief Vulnerability Overview Tool (BVOT) – that has been created for two NWS WFOs in the southeast to better inform forecasters of the vulnerabilities that partners and publics face. The presentation will conclude with a discussion of the operational/applied implications of this approach to social scientific research and how it reflects both the evolution of VORTEX-Southeast research and new paths forward for this critical initiative.